Log in
Shame and Shamelessness: Two Sides of the Same Coin
or What Healthy Guilt Can Teach Us
There’s a pattern I see everywhere, in families, relationships, workplaces, and society, and once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
It looks like people swinging wildly between two emotional extremes:
Unaccountable shamelessness: “They deserved it.”
“I had every right.”
“I’m not the problem.”
and
Self-attacking shame: “I’m a terrible person.”
“Everyone hates me.”
“I’m the worst.”
At first glance these seem opposite.
But I’ve come to believe something different:
Shame and shamelessness are both forms of self-preoccupation - two sides which don't face each other and yet both have the same impact:
the person who was hurt is left waiting, unseen, and unrepaired.
The emotional trap: swinging from high horse to self-attack
The “shameless” version is familiar to many of us.
It’s the mode where a person:
becomes righteous
doubles down
justifies their behaviour
positions themselves as superior
blunts empathy
refuses reflection
It can even feel good, because superiority is a powerful anaesthetic.
And indignation can function like empowerment in the same way caffeine functions like energy: quick delivery, immediate force, but not lasting.
It creates havoc in relationships.
Then sometimes the pendulum swings.
The same person collapses into shame:
“I’m terrible.”
“I’m the worst.”
“Everyone hates me.”
This can give the illusion of accountability - partly because many of us have been socialised into treating self-attack as virtue. But shame collapse usually isn’t accountability. It’s still self-preoccupation, just dressed in self-criticism.
And yes, I think it’s fair to name the larger cultural influence here: in many contexts, centuries of patriarchal social conditioning have normalised emotional patterns where dominance and defensiveness are rewarded, and vulnerability becomes either performative or weaponised. In that landscape, both shamelessness and shame can become socially supported escape routes from genuine repair.
Because shame collapse can become another form of self-focus - a way of pulling the whole room back into the self, making the moment about internal pain rather than external impact.
So the swing continues:
shamelessness → shame → shamelessness → shame
And nothing actually changes.
Why both shame and shamelessness keep us stuck
Here is the thread that ties them together:
Both positions keep attention locked on “me.”
Shamelessness says: I’m fine, you’re wrong.
Shame says: I’m terrible, comfort me.
Both prevent the middle move:
Looking behind yourself and noticing the person you hurt.
That’s the real developmental leap: the ability to step out of self-preoccupation and into relational reality.
This is why words alone don’t shift patterns.
What shifts patterns is stamina: the stamina to stay present with discomfort while turning toward impact.
The middle path: Healthy guilt
There is something in the centre of shame and shamelessness that most people were never taught.
It’s not self-attack.
It’s not superiority.
It’s not avoidance.
It’s healthy guilt.
Healthy guilt sounds like:
“That wasn’t okay.”
“I can see that hurt you.”
“I want to do this differently.”
“How can I make repair?”
Healthy guilt is not identity collapse.
It’s not:
“I’m a terrible person.”
It’s:
“I did a harmful thing.”
And that distinction is everything.
Why healthy guilt matters (especially in families)
In childhood, the shame script is developmentally common.
Kids will say:
“I’m the worst!”
“Everyone hates me!”
“I’m terrible!”
This isn’t manipulation in a calculated adult way, it’s usually a nervous system trying to regulate overwhelm. It can also be mimicry depending on what they have heard others say and when.
But the risk is this:
When adults rush in and only reassure the child’s worth, without guiding repair, the child learns a bypass.
They learn that self-attack = someone else rescues them from responsibility.
Over time, this can install a pattern:
Collapse into shame to escape consequences
Swing to shamelessness to escape pain
Never build the bridge into repair
This is how it becomes intergenerational.
What does it look like to teach the middle?
The goal is not to shame children out of shame.
The goal is to teach them:
worth is stable
behaviour has impact
repair is required
and they can do it
Here are examples of what a parent (or adult) might say:
1) Hold worth steady
“You’re not a bad person. You’re safe and loved.”
2) Hold behaviour accountable
“And what you did wasn’t okay.”
3) Turn toward impact
“Let’s look at who got hurt and what they need.”
4) Make a repair plan
“What can you do to make it better?”
This is how a child learns:
guilt is tolerable
accountability is possible
relationships can survive rupture
and repair is a skill, not a personality trait
But what about adults?
Many adults never learned this.
They learned scripts that look caring but actually keep them trapped.
Examples:
quick reassurance (“No no, you’re wonderful”)
quick minimising (“It’s fine, don’t worry about it”)
quick flipping into blame (“Well you made me do it”)
quick apology that centres the apologiser (“I feel terrible”)
The hard work is not thinking about others for five seconds when you’re in a good mood.
The hard work is learning the back-and-forth movement between self and other:
self-awareness → outward attention → accountability → repair → self-compassion
That movement requires emotional maturity.
It often requires unlearning.
This is why society feels stuck
When shame and shamelessness dominate culture, we get:
moral superiority
blame spirals
humiliation as entertainment
fragile egos
performative apologies
“I’m the worst” collapse
“they deserved it” justification
And very little genuine repair.
This is why I believe healthy guilt is quietly radical: it invites accountability without annihilation
Note on originality: this framing is not new, and I’m not presenting it as a novel insight. Variations of this idea exist in attachment literature, trauma-informed relational work, and accountability frameworks. I’m sharing it here because it still isn’t widely understood in mainstream culture, and repetition across different voices and contexts matters
A closing note
If you recognise yourself in either extreme : shame collapse or shameless superiority : that doesn’t mean you’re broken.
It means you’re human.
But it may also mean you were never taught the middle path.
Healthy guilt is the place where:
you can feel proportionately bad about bad behaviour
without becoming your behaviour
while holding yourself in warm regard as a flawed human
and staying turned toward the person you hurt
That’s where repair becomes real.
And real repair is one of the most healing things humans can learn.
